Demolishing Darling Harbour

This entry was posted on by .
JA2-450x295.jpg

Sydney Convention Centre, 1988. PHM collection 2009/55/1, Design archive, John Andrews / John Andrews International, Australia / USA / Canada, 1962-1992.

You might have read recently in the Sydney Morning Herald about the planned demolition of Sydney Convention Centre at Darling Harbour. The Centre’s architect John Andrews is not surprisingly unimpressed that another of his Australian designs is under threat after a mere 25 years of use.


John Andrews was the first Australian architect to create an international reputation. During the 1960s he designed a series of teaching and residential buildings at universities in Canada and the USA which were hugely influential on campus architecture in North America and elsewhere, including Australia. The best-known of these are Scarborough College at Toronto and the Harvard Graduate design school. John returned to Australia during the 1970s  as something of a conquering hero, and was rewarded by high-profile commissions including the Cameron Offices at Belconnen, Toad Hall at the ANU and the American Express Tower (now IAG House) at King and George Streets, Sydney.

00226990-300x192.jpg

Graduate School of Design, Harvard University. PHM collection 2009/55/1.

However John’s reputation in North America has proved more enduring than in his home country. Almost all of his numerous North American designs remain intact, valued and well-used. In contrast, much of John’s Australian work has suffered from renovations and even demolition. An example is the removal of the tinted ‘sunglasses’ which made IAG House a landmark and a leader in green office design.

The Convention Centre is the latest target for ill-advised attention, with the possibility of enlarging or otherwise improving a successful building already ruled out. The building has attracted praise for its ‘strong, precise geometry…and general clarity of execution…it is simply the best building in Darling Harbour’, despite an unpromising site – freeway to one side, shopping mall to the other, parking station and monorail at year. Like many Modernists Andrews respected Classical proportion, the secret of the Convention Centre’s appeal. Even Elizabeth Farrelly, serial critic of all things Darling Harbour, is a fan.

JA112-450x315.jpg

Convention Centre elevations c.1986. PHM collection 2009/55/1 Design archive, John Andrews / John Andrews International, Australia / USA / Canada, 1962-1992.

The Convention Centre has also been humanised by Robert Woodward’s spiralling interactive water sculpture (a favourite of old and young kids) and its large-scale commissioned paintings by Brett Whiteley, Charles Blackman and other Sydney artists.

JA4-300x201.jpg

Water Spiral by Robert Woodward. PHM collection 2009/55/1 Design archive, John Andrews / John Andrews International, Australia / USA / Canada, 1962-1992.

The politics and ethics of selling off public assets are not subjects for this blog, but the potential design outcomes are. It is telling that the Harbourside shopping mall will survive Lend Lease’s ‘world class’ revamp of Darling Harbour. Persumably the development company nor the mall’s owners couldn’t think of a way to profit from its demolition and replacement, so we are stuck with this drab 80s relic but not with proof that the 80s could also do good design. Certainly the generic pr squiggles promoted as replacements for the Convention and Exhibition Centres don’t convince that design is a determining factor; dollars and deal-making are evidently so.

JA3-300x200.jpg

Sydney Convention Centre 1988. PHM collection 2009/55/1 Design archive, John Andrews / John Andrews International, Australia / USA / Canada, 1962-1992.

Public buildings were once public assets in the broad sense. Colonial Architect James Barnet‘s work marked out a new society via the creation of its basic infrastructure – post offices, customs houses, courthouses and similar – most of which are still are still in use. Barnet’s building have not become disposable, tradeable assets, even when converted to other uses like Sydney’s GPO. It is a different story for recent generations of public architecture.

Handing the design and construct responsibilities to a major developer like Lend Lease is intended to absolve government of both financial and design risks, but the Barangaroo project – also by Lend Lease – suggests that the public are not always prepared to absolve the NSW government of responsibility for the outcomes.

John-A-198x300.jpg

John Andrews 2009. Photo by Charles Pickett.

Charles Pickett, curator.

2 thoughts on “Demolishing Darling Harbour

  1. Ed Truscott

    I am a resident of Pyrmont and I could not agree more with this assessment of the proposed changes to Darling Harbour. Without including Harbourside in the proposed redevelopment, the opportunity to design a trully great iconic area which includes the present Convention and Exhibition centres is lost. Instead we get eyesores. One shutters to think what will replace Harbourside in the near future.

  2. Stephanie

    Once it’s complete, I see no reason to want to visit there anymore. It’s an ugly money grab which no-one is going to thank them for in a generation’s time. It will kill it as a public space, and I’m guessing, that’s their very intention. I dare say most people agree, and so fed up with the futility of fighting it, will simply vote with their feet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>